July 2, 2024 | FDD Tracker: June 7, 2024-July 2, 2024

Biden Administration Foreign Policy Tracker: July

July 2, 2024 | FDD Tracker: June 7, 2024-July 2, 2024

Biden Administration Foreign Policy Tracker: July

Trend Overview

By John Hardie

Welcome back to the Biden Administration Foreign Policy Tracker. Once a month, we ask FDD’s experts and scholars to assess the administration’s foreign policy. They provide trendlines of very positive, positive, neutral, negative, or very negative for the areas they watch.

As Israel nears the end of its operation in Rafah, the Biden administration continued to push for a ceasefire but blamed Hamas for obstructing progress. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly accused Washington of withholding military assistance, but the Biden team insisted it is not blocking the delivery of materiel save for 2,000-pound bombs. Meanwhile, Washington continued attempting to broker a diplomatic solution to avert a full-scale wale between Israel and Hezbollah, though these efforts have struggled to gain traction.

At the G7 summit in Italy, President Joe Biden and his counterparts agreed to use windfall revenue from frozen Russian assets to finance a $50 billion loan for Ukraine aid, and the American and Ukrainian leaders signed a 10-year bilateral security agreement. Biden hopes both these measures will help lock in U.S. support for Ukraine. The Biden team also took steps to provide Kyiv with additional air defenses, although Washington continues to bar Ukraine from employing American-supplied ATACMS missiles to strike airbases and other targets inside Russia.

In the South China Sea, Beijing escalated its maritime aggression against the Philippines. And while the United States is pursuing closer defense-industrial ties with key Indo-Pacific allies and partners, Washington is struggling to stem the expansion of China’s military footprint and influence in the region and beyond.

Check back next month to see how the administration deals with these and other challenges.

Disclaimer

The analyses above do not necessarily represent the institutional views of FDD.