May 26, 2026 | Policy Brief
Curbing Iran Means an Israel Unfettered in Lebanon
May 26, 2026 | Policy Brief
Curbing Iran Means an Israel Unfettered in Lebanon
Amid the ongoing, fitful diplomacy to end the war between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, the conflict’s second front, between Lebanon and Israel, is picking up pace.
While Israel has limited its attacks on Hezbollah, Iran’s Lebanese terror proxy, since a renewed ceasefire was brokered by the United States in April, its patience is running out. Low-tech drone attacks by Hezbollah are bleeding the IDF and threatening Israeli border communities.
Washington must understand that unfettered Israeli actions are not only vital for its defense. They also undercut Tehran’s bid to sustain its regional hegemony as it pretends to seek peace.
Israel Steps Up Operations Against Hezbollah
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed on May 25 to “step on the gas” in the war against Hezbollah, which continues to pose a threat despite being driven out of its former fiefdom in southern Lebanon and losing the bulk of its missile arsenal. The following day the IDF ordered residents of some border communities to avoid congregating in large numbers.
Since the April 17 ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, the IDF has lost 10 soldiers on the Lebanese front. The bulk of these casualties were mostly the result of fiber optic-guided exploding drones, whose ability to skirt electronic jamming has also posed a constant menace to civilians in northern Israel.
This escalation fueled demands in Israel to take the fight to the enemy. After Netanyahu’s latest warning, Israel struck Hezbollah targets in the Bekaa Valley and around Tyre. In Dahiyeh, the Beirut district that houses Hezbollah headquarters, some residents fled in anticipation.
According to Gila Gamliel, a member of Israel’s war cabinet, Netanyahu wants to enlist the United States, together with the Lebanese government, in a partnership that would decisively strip Hezbollah of its weapons and advance an Israeli-Lebanese accord.
Tehran Using Negotiations With U.S. To Protect Hezbollah
Unsurprisingly, a Lebanon linkage is among the points of leverage that Iran has been using in its negotiations with the Trump administration. As well as demanding financial relief and downstream nuclear negotiations, Tehran is also pushing for an “all fronts” ceasefire — code for ending Israeli operations against Hezbollah — as part of any initial understanding with Washington.
So far, the United States has been unmoved by this Iranian condition. “If Hezbollah is going to launch missiles or launches missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that, or to prevent that from happening,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on May 25.
Rubio also condemned a speech by Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem calling for the ouster of the Lebanese government, asserting that the terrorist organization is “actively trying to drag Lebanon back into chaos and destruction.”
Regional Peace Impossible Without Removal of Hezbollah
President Donald Trump should push back against Iran’s attempt to rescue Hezbollah, the jewel in its crown when it comes to Tehran’s proxies around the region.
Bullet-proofing Hezbollah at this juncture in the war would be equivalent to letting Iran recover its enriched uranium from the ruins of Isfahan and secretly stow away the material elsewhere.
Defanging Hezbollah in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1701, passed 20 years ago, would assist with pacifying Lebanon by removing Iran’s malign influence from the country.
Until that happens, Israel will legitimately want to preserve its southern Lebanese buffer zone — with firepower, if necessary. That approach deserves the full-throated support not only of the Trump administration, but also of the Lebanese government, which has publicly condemned Israel even as the sides privately discuss ways of eliminating the mutual burden of Hezbollah.
Trump wants any peace deal with Iran to bring about an expansion of the Abraham Accords, with Lebanon among the front-runners in terms of potential signatories. As welcome a development as that would be, the terrorist threat must be snuffed out before any ceremony can be held.
Mark Dubowitz is the CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). For more analysis from Mark and FDD, please subscribe HERE. Follow FDD on X @FDD. Follow Mark on X @mdubowitz. FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.