March 14, 2016 | The Washington Post

Turkey’s Erdogan must reform or resign

Makalenin Türkçe çevirisini buradan okuyabilirsiniz

Co-written with Mort Abramowitz

Under the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey has steadily descended into authoritarianism and instability. The recent government seizure of one of the main opposition media groups, including Turkey’s highest-circulation newspaper, is only the latest demonstration of how Erdogan has betrayed his county’s potential.

When Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AK Party) took power in 2003, they strengthened the Turkish economy and improved Turkey’s relations with its neighbors. The AK Party pursued European Union membership, ended military domination over Turkish politics and tried to find a peaceful solution to the country’s long-standing Kurdish problem.

By 2012, Erdogan could confidently declare, “We have a bright future.” After nearly a decade of political progress, economic growth and growing international approval, he could dare to promise that by 2023, the centenary of the republic, Turkey would be “one of the greatest powers of its region and the world.”

Today, Turkey’s future looks much bleaker. Rather than greatness, Erdogan has steered it toward authoritarianism, economic slowdown and civil war.

Clearly, democracy cannot flourish under Erdogan now. The transformative reforms the AK Party originally promised have given way to systematic abuses of basic freedoms and legal rights. The AK Party’s heralded attempt to hold the military accountable for its undemocratic behavior was a show trial in which manufactured evidence served to implicate political opponents. Early interference with the media — slapping an opposition media conglomerate with a $2.5 billion tax fine in 2009 and forcing a newspaper to fire a critical columnist in 2007 — was just an indication of the AK Party’s now far-reaching efforts to muzzle the press, whether by jailing journalists or authorizing government takeovers of critical outlets. Nor has civil society been spared Erdogan’s heavy-handed tactics: In 2013, protests against the government in Istanbul’s Gezi Park were met with deadly police violence.

Indeed, recent developments in Turkey bring to mind frightening cliches and dark moments of 20th-century totalitarianism. An AK Party parliamentarian led a mob to attack the offices of a newspaper lambasted by Erdogan just days prior. Several AK Party members, including former president Abdullah Gul, have been removed from an official online list of the party’s founding members. Among thousands of others, a 13-year-old boy was arrested for insulting Erdogan, and a woman who did likewise was denounced in the courts by her own husband. Tens of thousands of children, including religious minorities, have been forcibly sent to Islamic schools or subjected to mandatory Islamic religious education. Now, as Erdogan seeks to transform the Turkish constitution to entrench his power as president, such abuses will likely become the norm.

Authoritarian leaders usually justify their rule by insisting they are bringing their citizens stability and prosperity. In Turkey, Erdogan’s policies are putting both of these further beyond the people’s reach. After supporting and arming extremist groups in the Syrian conflict, Turkey is now experiencing dangerous blowback from the terrorism it helped stoke. Bombings in Istanbul and Ankara have created shocking scenes of carnage. Yet Turkey continues to insist that Syrian Kurdish groups — not the Islamic State or Jabhat al-Nusra — are the greatest threat in Syria.

The repercussions of this authoritarianism and instability are taking their toll on Turkey’s tourism industry and scaring away foreign investors, leaving many economists worried about the future of the Turkish economy. In 2008, the Turkish lira was almost equal to the dollar. Now the exchange rate is 3-to-1 . And while Turkey’s efforts to care for millions of Syrian refugees are truly impressive, they tax the Turkish economy in ways that ordinary citizens are all too aware of.

Worse, the collapse of negotiations between the AK Party and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) last year has reignited a military conflict that many hoped Turkey was on the verge of resolving. The PKK is a terrorist group with a track record of violence that hardly makes it an ideal partner for peace, but the Turkish people nonetheless have the right to hold their government accountable for the negotiations’ failure. Now, Turkish soldiers and civilians continue to die in a worsening conflict, and the government has no realistic plan for stopping or winning it. The horrible bombing in Ankara on Feb. 17, carried out by a PKK splinter faction, portends a spread of violence that could throw Turkey back into the civil war that decimated the country in the 1970s and ’80s.

We continue to believe that a strong, stable and democratic Turkey is both possible and essential. But this requires a government committed to these goals and intent on achieving them. If Erdogan still wants to deliver a brighter future for his country, he has to reform or resign.